Unidentified early 17th-century Lübeck copyist, Emblematic Scroll in Latin, attributed to George Ripley (1415-1490), circa 1600. Watercolour, wash, and ink on woven paper mounted on linen, 343 x 38 1/2 cm. Wellcome Collection, London. ‘The Cult of Beauty’ exhibition, 26 October 2023 – 28 April 2024

Few objects capture the uneasy fascination of early modern Europe with the secret sciences as vividly as the so-called Ripley Scrolls. Vast, enigmatic, and crowded with alchemical imagery, they were never simple treatises but theatrical instruments of wonder, combining learned text with dazzling emblematic pictures. Only twenty-one copies survive, dating between the 16th and 17th centuries, each varying in detail but united by their cryptic illustrations of the quest for the Philosopher’s Stone.
The name of George Ripley (c.1415–1490), an Augustinian canon and alchemist, hovers over these works, yet without certainty. Ripley’s writings, especially his Compound of Alchemy (1471), circulated widely in manuscript and print and became touchstones of English alchemical literature. The scrolls, however, are unlikely to be his own work. Rather, they use his reputation to lend authority to what were already evolving pictorial and poetic traditions of alchemical allegory. The Wellcome Library preserves two such scrolls, MS.692 and MS.693, the latter shown in the recent exhibition. Made in Lübeck around 1600, this copy stretches over three metres, demanding to be unfurled in sequence like a ceremonial object. Its imagery unfolds as a kind of visual riddle: a monstrous toad swelling with corruption, figures gathered around a fountain of living waters, a radiant golden eagle, a ravenous green dragon, and finally the solitary philosopher-alchemist himself. Each image is paired with verses in Latin, elaborating the process of purification, death, and rebirth that defined alchemical practice. What makes these scrolls remarkable is not their practicality—no alchemist could have used them as a literal handbook—but their symbolic density. They reveal how alchemy in the Renaissance and early modern period was as much a language of metaphor, myth, and art as it was of experiment.
The toad embodies base matter awaiting transformation; the dragon’s blood symbolises the hidden elixir of life; the eagle takes flight as the volatile spirit. Read together, they chart a vision of alchemy not merely as metallurgical craft but as a universal drama of corruption, dissolution, and final perfection. Their preservation in collections was not accidental. The scrolls were prized less as working documents than as marvels of design, treasured by collectors who valued their combination of mystery, artistry, and erudition. They embodied the allure of hidden wisdom, lending prestige to libraries and cabinets of curiosities, where they were displayed alongside rare manuscripts, exotic specimens, and antiquities. For the early modern elite, owning such a scroll meant possession of an object that was as intellectually fashionable as it was visually extraordinary—a reminder that the pursuit of knowledge in this period was inseparable from spectacle, imagination, and the performance of learning.


