Month: February 2025

  • Attributed to William Larkin (c. 1580–1619) and his workshop,’ Portrait of Richard Sackville (1589–1624), 3rd Earl of Dorset’, 1613

     Attributed to William Larkin (c. 1580–1619) and his workshop, Portrait of Richard Sackville (1589–1624), 3rd Earl of Dorset, 1613, Oil on canvas, 206.4 x 122.3 cm, Kenwood House, London

    Attributed to William Larkin (c. 1580–1619) and his workshop, Portrait of Richard Sackville (1589–1624), 3rd Earl of Dorset, 1613, Oil on canvas, 206.4 x 122.3 cm, Kenwood House, London

    William Larkin was one of the last exponents of the Elizabethan and early Jacobean portrait tradition before Antoon van Dyck transformed the mainstream courtly portraiture. While Italian and Netherlandish artists were refining perspective and developing a more naturalistic treatment of the human form, Larkin remained rooted in the English preference for symbolic display over realism. His portraits are less concerned with capturing a sitter’s psychology than with asserting status, where every fold of fabric and decorative flourish becomes a cypher for wealth and lineage.

    This portrait exists in a few versions of varying quality, possibly created in collaboration with assistants. Like all of Larkin’s sitters, Sackville is presented not as an individual but as an embodiment of power; his portrait is a carefully constructed performance of privilege at the height of Jacobean England. Sackville, an influential courtier under James I, is encased in a suit of black silk embroidered in gold, a direct assertion of rank. Black was the preferred colour of the Jacobean elite, expensive to dye and flattering under candlelight. At the same time, the elaborate embroidery, stitched with imported gold and silver thread, was the hallmark of courtly luxury. His ruff, a magnificent construction of delicate lace, frames his face with an almost sculptural rigidity, its complexity reinforcing his wealth—lace of this quality was among the most expensive garments, mainly sourced from Flanders.

    Larkin stages his sitter against a backdrop of deep red drapery, symbolising power, while beneath his feet lies a richly woven Persian or Ottoman carpet. These elements were carefully chosen not as an accurate setting but as a stylised, theatrical environment designed to heighten the sense of aristocratic grandeur. The rigid posture, the detached gaze, and the impossibly pristine garments create an image that is less a portrait than a heraldic statement.

    Attributed to William Larkin (c. 1580–1619) and his workshop, Portrait of Richard Sackville (1589–1624), 3rd Earl of Dorset, 1613, Oil on canvas, 206.4 x 122.3 cm, Kenwood House, London
  • Danson House in Bexleyheath, Greater London

    Danson House in London’s  Bexleyheath, designed by Sir Robert Taylor (1714–1788) in the 1760s for Sir John Boyd (1718–1800), is a prime example of 18th-century British Palladianism. Built as a country retreat overlooking Danson Park, the house reflects the architectural ideals of Andrea Palladio (1508–1580), whose principles were the base for many architectural schools following the Renaissance. 

    Danson House in Bexleyheath, London
    Danson House in Bexleyheath, London

    Boyd made his fortune through the sugar trade and the British East India Company, industries deeply connected to colonial exploitation and the transatlantic slave trade. Yet, figures like Boyd sought to distance themselves from the brutal realities of commerce by commissioning grand country houses that aligned them with the refined cultural traditions. Building in a style associated with the ideals of order and civilisation reinforced their social status and aligned themselves with Britain’s established landed gentry.

    Danson House exemplifies key Palladian features: a symmetrical façade, a central domed salon inspired by classical rotundas, and carefully proportioned interiors that reflect the principles outlined in Palladio’s ‘ I Quattro Libri dell’Architettura’ (1570). The house was initially surrounded by an extensive landscaped park, designed by the famous landscape gardener Capability Brown (1716–1783); as a provincial estate rather than a grand aristocratic palace, Danson House also demonstrates how Palladian ideals were adapted for wealthy but non-noble patrons, showing the broader appeal and flexibility of the style.

    By the late 18th century, Palladianism had emerged as a dominant force in British architecture. This was partly due to the influence of notable architects and patrons such as Colen Campbell (1676–1729), Lord Burlington (1694–1753), and William Kent (1685–1748). Their work, along with publications like Campbell’s ‘Vitruvius Britannicus’ (1715–1725), played a significant role in spreading Palladian principles throughout mainstream architecture.

    Danson House in Bexleyheath, London
    Danson House in Bexleyheath, London
    Danson House in Bexleyheath, London
    Danson House in Bexleyheath, London
  • Ferdinand Bol (1616–1680), Portrait of an Unknown Woman, c.1644

     Ferdinand Bol (1616–1680), Portrait of an Unknown Woman, c.1644, Oil on canvas, 106.7 x 91.5 cm,  Kenwood House, London

     Ferdinand Bol (1616–1680), Portrait of an Unknown Woman, c.1644, Oil on canvas, 106.7 x 91.5 cm,  Kenwood House, London

    This work was attributed to Rembrandt for nearly two centuries, a testament to how deeply Bol absorbed his master’s techniques. Bol studied under Rembrandt in Amsterdam, likely between 1636 and 1641, and was one of the most successful artists to emerge from his workshop. His early portraits, including this one, owe much to Rembrandt’s manner, particularly in using chiaroscuro and rendering fabric textures. The soft fall of light across the woman’s face and hands, set against a deep brown background, is strikingly Rembrandtesque, while the careful depiction of her ruff, cuffs, and jewellery reflects the intense material realism that Rembrandt instilled in his pupils. Yet, while Bol excelled in mimicking Rembrandt’s technique, his work was often softer and more polished, lacking some of the raw emotional intensity and dynamic composition that defined Rembrandt’s mature portraits.

    The seater’s broad, pleated lace collar reflects the changing fashion trends of the period, moving away from the stiff, structured ruffs of earlier decades towards more relaxed yet still elaborate forms of lacework.

    Jewellery plays a subtle yet significant role in the composition. The presence of a prominent engagement ring, subtly displayed on her left hand, serves as a conventional symbol of commitment in Dutch portraiture. Unlike the ostentatious adornments favoured in the fashion of Southern Europe, Dutch portraiture of the 1640s adhered to a more restrained aesthetic, where wealth was suggested through delicate lace, silk, and understated gold jewellery rather than excessive ornamentation. The simplicity of her adornments aligns with the Calvinist values of the Dutch Republic, where material prosperity was acknowledged but not flaunted.

     Ferdinand Bol (1616–1680), Portrait of an Unknown Woman, c.1644, Oil on canvas, 106.7 x 91.5 cm,  Kenwood House, London
  • Richard Jupp (1728–1799) and the Georgian Adaptation of Palladio: Guy’s Hospital Chapel (1780)

    Georgian architecture is a paradox of reverence and reinvention. It borrowed from the past yet refined it through Enlightenment rationality. Rooted in Palladian purity, it softened classical rigidity, balancing grandeur with clarity and function. Guy’s Chapel in London is a testament to this balance—historical in inspiration yet modern in execution.

    Guy’s Hospital Chapel in London
    Guy’s Hospital Chapel in London

    Andrea Palladio’s (1508–1580) influence on Georgian architecture was one of adaptation rather than imitation. His ‘I Quattro Libri dell’Architettura’ (1570) provided a framework of proportion and clarity, but by the 18th century, British architects refined his principles into a more restrained aesthetic. Palladio’s villas and public buildings, designed for an Italian context, were transformed in England into grand yet sober compositions, where classical harmony was preserved but excess removed. This recalibration ensured that his influence remained essential even two centuries later.

    Guy’s Hospital Chapel, designed by Richard Jupp (1728–1799) and completed in 1780, exemplifies this restrained fusion of old ideas. Built for worship within the hospital founded by Thomas Guy (1644–1724), it was conceived as a dignified yet unpretentious space. Jupp, known for his work with the British East India Company, balanced classical symmetry with the practical needs of a working institution.

    The chapel’s interior is a masterclass in Georgian spatial composition. A three-sided gallery, supported by Ionic columns, encloses the space, reinforcing Palladian proportion. While incorporating modern 18th-century plastering techniques, the ceiling adheres to classical ideals. A circular fan motif punctuates a flat plaster expanse framed by groined semi-vaults springing from the Ionic columns. Lighter materials and advanced methods allowed intricate yet restrained detailing, proving that technical innovation did not necessitate abandoning classical principles.

    Guy’s Hospital Chapel in London
    Guy’s Hospital Chapel in London
  • The Tower of St Alban, Wood Street, London

    The Tower of St Alban, Wood Street, is the only surviving part of the church rebuilt by Sir Christopher Wren after the Great Fire of London in 1666. The medieval church was destroyed in the fire, and Wren’s reconstruction was completed by 1685. The building suffered severe damage during the Blitz in 1940, and the main body was demolished in the 1950s, leaving only the tower standing.

    The Tower of St Alban, Wood Street, the City of London
    The Tower of St Alban, Wood Street, the City of London

    Traditions suggest that a church existed on this site as early as 930 AD, possibly linked to King Offa of Mercia, but no historical records confirm this. The first reliable references appear in medieval tax rolls from the 12th or 13th century, where it is listed as ‘St Alban Wuderstrate’. While its early history remains uncertain, it was established as a significant parish church in medieval London until its destruction in the 20th century.

    Christopher Wren’s reconstruction in 1685 followed his characteristic Baroque approach but incorporated elements of English Perpendicular Gothic, a feature seen in some of his post-Fire churches, where medieval influences remained strong. The church had a rectangular nave with side aisles, separated by Tuscan columns, reflecting Wren’s preference for Classical order. The tower, positioned at the northwest corner, retained a strong vertical emphasis and some Perpendicular Gothic influences, particularly in its proportions and pinnacles. However, the overall execution remained closer to Wren’s restrained, geometric Baroque rather than an entirely Gothic revival.

    The tower consists of three diminishing stages. The lower stage features rusticated stonework, creating a solid visual base. The middle section has arched belfry openings with decorative keystones and pilasters, a feature consistent with Wren’s Classical detailing. The upper section is marked by voluted stone consoles supporting a parapet, above which rise four stone pinnacles. These pinnacles, a distinctly Gothic element, were restored during the 19th-century alterations by George Gilbert Scott, who also added structural reinforcements to the tower.

  • Giambologna (1529–1608),’ River God’, c. 1580

    Giambologna (1529–1608), River God, c. 1580, Terracotta bozzetto, 31 × 39.4 × 25 cm, Victoria & Albert Museum, London

    Giambologna (1529–1608), River God, c. 1580, Terracotta bozzetto, 31 × 39.4 × 25 cm, Victoria & Albert Museum, London

    Giambologna, born Jean de Boulogne in 1529 in Flemish Douai, was one of the defining sculptors of the late 16th century. His work epitomises the sophistication of Mannerism, moving beyond the balanced harmony of the High Renaissance towards compositions charged with movement and complexity. After settling in Florence, he became closely tied to the Medici court, where his innovative approach to form and gesture left a lasting impact on European art. His sculptures, often infused with a sense of controlled dynamism, influenced generations of sculptors and paved the way for the expressive drama of the Baroque period.

    Giambologna (1529–1608), River God, c. 1580, Terracotta bozzetto, 31 × 39.4 × 25 cm, Victoria & Albert Museum, London

    This study sculpture, made around 1580, captures Giambologna’s mastery of movement and offers a glimpse into his working process. Created in terracotta as a bozzetto or sketch model, it was likely an exploratory piece linked to an unrealised plan for a colossal figure of the River Nile at Francesco de’ Medici’s villa at Pratolino. Rather than lying passively, the figure seems to push itself upwards, its head twisting away from the torso in a dramatic interplay of diagonals. The right arm folds across the body, creating a tension that heightens the impression of movement. Giambologna’s handling of this transition from repose to action demonstrates his skill in manipulating the human form to suggest physical energy held in suspension.

    Giambologna (1529–1608), River God, c. 1580, Terracotta bozzetto, 31 × 39.4 × 25 cm, Victoria & Albert Museum, London

    His method of sculpting in clay was spontaneous and instinctive, revealing his technical fluency and artistic confidence. Working with wet clay, he rapidly blocked out the figure’s major masses, shaping the muscles and limbs with his fingers rather than relying heavily on tools. The muscular structure is built up in rounded forms—almost like fused spheres—while details such as facial features and fingers are incised with quick, decisive strokes of a pointed instrument. The rough, tactile surface suggests that the piece was not made for public display but as part of his creative process, allowing him to refine ideas before executing them in a more permanent material.

    Giambologna (1529–1608), River God, c. 1580, Terracotta bozzetto, 31 × 39.4 × 25 cm, Victoria & Albert Museum, London
    Giambologna (1529–1608), River God, c. 1580, Terracotta bozzetto, 31 × 39.4 × 25 cm, Victoria & Albert Museum, London
  • Pellegrino di Giovanni (active 1397–1435), ‘The Virgin and Child with Angels; in the gable: King David holding a Psaltery’, 1428

     Pellegrino di Giovanni (active 1397–1435), The Virgin and Child with Angels; in the gable: King David holding a Psaltery, 1428, Tempera on wood, 113.5 x 60.5 cm, Victoria &  Albert Museum, London

    Pellegrino di Giovanni (active 1397–1435), The Virgin and Child with Angels; in the gable: King David holding a Psaltery, 1428, Tempera on wood, 113.5 x 60.5 cm, Victoria &  Albert Museum, London

    This altarpiece stands at the crossroads of Gothic splendour and early Renaissance humanism. Originally part of an altarpiece in the Church of San Domenico, Perugia, it reflects shifting artistic sensibilities. While its gilded background and ornate throne recall Gothic tradition, Pellegrino introduces spatial depth, individualised expressions, and structure, aligning with Renaissance realism.

    The composition draws from Gentile da Fabriano’s altarpiece in the same church, maintaining celestial grandeur while adding volume. The Virgin enthroned with the Christ Child symbolises divine motherhood. Incised and painted angels enhance the ethereal effect, while King David, in the gable, holding a psaltery, reinforces the Old Testament’s link to Christ. Though Gothic in structure, the figures’ proportions and direct engagement with the viewer signal emerging Renaissance ideals.

    What sets this painting apart is Pellegrino’s handling of figures and space. The faces, no longer rigidly idealised, convey human emotion. The richly detailed yet solid throne demonstrates awareness of weight and perspective. The angels’ placement suggests depth, moving beyond flat Gothic compositions. The restrained use of gold enhances the atmosphere rather than serving as decoration, reflecting a new interest in light and form.

    Heraldic symbols, particularly the coat of arms of Nicola di Giovanni di Benedetto di Giovanni, mark the rise of secular patronage. His golden lion on a blue field shifts the work’s function from devotion to personal status. The merchant’s warehouse mark further reinforces his civic importance.

    Though not revolutionary, the piece represents early fifteenth-century painting’s transition, balancing Gothic ornament with emerging Renaissance realism. Pellegrino di Giovanni’s legacy reflects a broader artistic shift where devotional imagery merged with humanist ideals, paving the way for a more engaged, emotionally resonant visual language.

    Pellegrino di Giovanni (active 1397–1435), The Virgin and Child with Angels; in the gable: King David holding a Psaltery, 1428, Tempera on wood, 113.5 x 60.5 cm, Victoria &  Albert Museum, London
    Pellegrino di Giovanni (active 1397–1435), The Virgin and Child with Angels; in the gable: King David holding a Psaltery, 1428, Tempera on wood, 113.5 x 60.5 cm, Victoria &  Albert Museum, London
    Pellegrino di Giovanni (active 1397–1435), The Virgin and Child with Angels; in the gable: King David holding a Psaltery, 1428, Tempera on wood, 113.5 x 60.5 cm, Victoria &  Albert Museum, London
    Pellegrino di Giovanni (active 1397–1435), The Virgin and Child with Angels; in the gable: King David holding a Psaltery, 1428, Tempera on wood, 113.5 x 60.5 cm, Victoria &  Albert Museum, London
    Pellegrino di Giovanni (active 1397–1435), The Virgin and Child with Angels; in the gable: King David holding a Psaltery, 1428, Tempera on wood, 113.5 x 60.5 cm, Victoria &  Albert Museum, London
    Pellegrino di Giovanni (active 1397–1435), The Virgin and Child with Angels; in the gable: King David holding a Psaltery, 1428, Tempera on wood, 113.5 x 60.5 cm, Victoria &  Albert Museum, London
    Pellegrino di Giovanni (active 1397–1435), The Virgin and Child with Angels; in the gable: King David holding a Psaltery, 1428, Tempera on wood, 113.5 x 60.5 cm, Victoria &  Albert Museum, London
    Pellegrino di Giovanni (active 1397–1435), The Virgin and Child with Angels; in the gable: King David holding a Psaltery, 1428, Tempera on wood, 113.5 x 60.5 cm, Victoria &  Albert Museum, London
    Pellegrino di Giovanni (active 1397–1435), The Virgin and Child with Angels; in the gable: King David holding a Psaltery, 1428, Tempera on wood, 113.5 x 60.5 cm, Victoria &  Albert Museum, London
  • Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500

    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery

    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery
    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery

    These astonishing 500-year-old ceiling frescos exemplify Andrea Mantegna’s (1431–1506) lasting impact on Renaissance artists, particularly his innovative use of perspective. Mantegna’s pioneering technique of di sotto in sù (‘from below, upward’) created the illusions of figures and architecture extending into the viewer’s space. This method profoundly influenced many  Italian artists. The fresco is a rich tapestry of Renaissance iconography and embodies the pursuit of knowledge, artistic excellence, and the revival of ancient ideals within contemporary humanist thought.

    At its centre, the oculus features an older man, a woman, and a boy peering down from a deep blue sky, a motif inspired by Mantegna’s work in the Camera degli Sposi in Mantua. This trompe-l’œil effect creates an illusion of depth, drawing viewers into an imagined celestial realm. Surrounding this scene are depictions of Apollo, the god of Music and Poetry, alongside the nine Muses, each representing a different artistic or scholarly discipline. Calliope, the Muse of epic poetry, is shown holding a trumpet; Clio, representing history, appears accompanied by a swan; Euterpe, associated with music, plays a double flute; Erato, linked to lyric poetry, holds a tambourine; Melpomene, the Muse of tragedy, carries a horn; Polyhymnia, representing sacred poetry, is depicted with an organ; Terpsichore, symbolising dance, plays a viol; Thalia, the Muse of comedy, also holds a viol; and Urania, associated with astronomy, gazes at a celestial sphere.

    Beneath this celestial assembly, the lunettes contain paired profile portraits of Roman emperors and their wives, possibly including figures such as Augustus and Scribonia. These portraits, rendered like bas-relief sculptures, are likely based on ancient coins, reinforcing the Renaissance’s admiration for classical antiquity. The careful arrangement of figures and the sophisticated use of perspective highlight the period’s intellectual and artistic ambitions.

    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery
    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery
    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery
    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery
    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery
    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery
    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery
    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery
    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery
    Alessandro Pampurino (c. 1460/62–c. 1522/23) and Antonio della Corna, Fresco ceiling from the Casa Maffi, Cremona, c. 1500, V&A, London, The Robert H. Smith Gallery