Category: Northern Renaissance

  • Christopher Weiditz (c.1500–c.1560), ‘Hercules Removing a Thorn from his Foot’, c.1540–50.

    Christopher Weiditz (c.1500–c.1560), Hercules Removing a Thorn from his Foot, c.1540–50. Ivory sculpture, 15.3 × 10 × 10.5 cm. Victoria and Albert Museum, London


    Christopher Weiditz (c.1500–c.1560), Hercules Removing a Thorn from his Foot, c.1540–50. Ivory sculpture, 15.3 × 10 × 10.5 cm. Victoria and Albert Museum, London

    Christopher Weiditz, active in Strasbourg and southern Germany, was among the more inventive sculptors of the German Renaissance. His travels with Emperor Charles V’s court allowed him to study antique models and the most celebrated art collections of his age, experiences that shaped the blend of classical reference and naturalistic observation visible in his work.

    This small, partly damaged ivory statuette was once almost certainly part of a princely Kunstkammer, intended to be handled and admired as a curiosity of art and erudition. A companion piece representing Cleopatra, now in the Germanisches Nationalmuseum, Nuremberg, suggests it originally formed part of a pair. The figure adapts the celebrated antique prototype of the Spinario—the boy plucking a thorn from his foot—yet transforms it into an image of Hercules. The hero sits cross-legged on a tree trunk draped with the skin of the Nemean lion, the first of his Labours, whose defeat became one of his most recognisable attributes.

    Here Hercules appears not as the bearded strongman of later legend but as a youthful, clean-shaven figure, his body still echoing the antique Spinario. The modelling of the head, however, moves towards a greater naturalism and may reflect a study from life. The ivory thus embodies a Renaissance play between the ancient and the modern: a classical pose reinterpreted through the lens of myth, reimagined by a sculptor alive to the possibilities of direct observation.

  • Gossaert’s Adam and Eve, Between Human Desire and Divine Command.

    Jan Gossaert (c.1478–1532), Adam and Eve, c.1520. Oil on oak, 166.5 × 109 cm. The Royal Collection, on long-term loan to The National Gallery, London

    Jan Gossaert (c.1478–1532), Adam and Eve, c.1520. Oil on oak, 166.5 × 109 cm. The Royal Collection, on long-term loan to The National Gallery, London

    Gossaert’s Adam and Eve belongs to a long Northern tradition in which the unclothed human body was framed less as a celebration of beauty than as a vehicle for moral instruction. Since the fifteenth century, artists in the Low Countries and Germany had developed a visual language in which nudity was bound to the Fall, serving to articulate themes of sin, desire and human frailty. This work, painted around 1520, engages directly with that tradition while also introducing new Italianate elements derived from Gossaert’s exposure to Renaissance art during his travels to Italy in the entourage of Philip of Burgundy.

    The composition is rich in symbolic detail. The Tree of Knowledge rises at the centre, its branches twined with the serpent, while Adam reaches for the fruit held out by Eve. Beneath them grow columbine, associated with the fear of God, and sea holly, prized for its aphrodisiac qualities—a juxtaposition that crystallises the tension between reverence and sensual appetite. The setting expands into a landscape of Eden, with the Fountain of Life as its focal point, anchoring the figures within a theological geography of paradise and loss.

    The influence of Albrecht Dürer’s Adam and Eve engraving of 1504 is evident, as is Gossaert’s awareness of Marcantonio Raimondi’s prints after Raphael. Yet the result is not a mere adaptation. Gossaert’s nudes, though often described as awkward in their proportions, possess a sculptural weight and a heightened expressiveness in their faces that distinguish them from both Italian prototypes and the smoother idealisations of his Netherlandish contemporaries.

    In this way the painting fuses Northern moral didacticism with Italian notions of the antique body. The nude here is neither purely classical nor wholly medieval in conception, but a hybrid form through which Gossaert explored the human condition: vulnerable, fallible, and suspended between physical desire and divine command.

    Bibliography

    Ainsworth, M.W. (ed.) (2010) Man, Myth and Sensual Pleasures: Jan Gossart’s Renaissance. New Haven and London: Yale University Press in association with The Metropolitan Museum of Art

    Bass, M.A. (2016) Jan Gossart and the Invention of Netherlandish Antiquity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Hugo van der Goes between Devotion and Withdrawal, Where Portraiture Bears the Mark of Personal Struggle.

    Hugo van der Goes (c.1440–1482/83), Portrait of a Man with John the Baptist, c.1475–80. Oil on wood, 23.2 × 22.5 cm. Gemäldegalerie, Berlin, on short-term loan from The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore

    Hugo van der Goes (c.1440–1482/83), Portrait of a Man with John the Baptist, c.1475–80. Oil on wood, 23.2 × 22.5 cm. Gemäldegalerie, Berlin, on short-term loan from The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore

    Hugo van der Goes was one of the most prominent painters of the Burgundian Netherlands in the later fifteenth century. His work continued the achievements of Robert Campin (c.1375–1444), Rogier van der Weyden (c.1399–1464), and Jan van Eyck (c.1390–1441), yet developed a more searching naturalism that set him apart from his predecessors and gave his paintings a distinctive, at times slightly melancholic, quality. This impression has been deepened by what is known of his personal drama — his withdrawal from public life at the height of his popularity and the mental struggles that marked his final years.

    This panel, a donor portrait accompanied by John the Baptist, was almost certainly the right wing of a private devotional diptych. The lost left wing would have contained the Virgin and Child, the object of the donor’s prayer. The man kneels in profile with joined hands, his attention fixed upon the absent Virgin, while John the Baptist, identifiable by his red cloak, stands behind him as intercessor.

    The remarkable individuality of the donor’s features reflects van der Goes’s commitment to lifelike portraiture, while his handling of the figures shows his dialogue with Rogier van der Weyden’s formulae. At the same time, the panel illustrates the fragmented state of van der Goes’s surviving oeuvre, much of which was dispersed or lost after his death.

    The artist’s biography has long shaped the interpretation of his work. In 1477, at the height of his career, van der Goes withdrew to the Rood Klooster, an Augustinian priory near Brussels, where he suffered episodes of mental collapse that contemporaries recorded with fascination. His retreat and eventual death there in 1482/83 have coloured the later reception of his art as meditative and sombre, qualities associated with an artist who was intensely absorbed in his craft and constantly striving to surpass the achievements of earlier masters.

  • Workshop of Michael Sittow (1469–1525), The Holy Kinship, early 16th century.

    Workshop of Michael Sittow (1469–1525), The Holy Kinship, early 16th century.



    Workshop of Michael Sittow (1469–1525), The Holy Kinship, early 16th century, produced in Tallinn (then Reval), the Niguliste Museum, Tallinn, on loan from Bollnäs Church, Sweden