Month: October 2024

  • Rubens, Genoa and the Spanish Imperial World

    Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640), Equestrian Portrait of Giancarlo Doria, 1606, Oil on canvas, 265 × 188 cm, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa

    Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640), Equestrian Portrait of Giancarlo Doria, 1606, Oil on canvas, 265 × 188 cm, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa
    Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640), Equestrian Portrait of Giancarlo Doria, 1606, Oil on canvas, 265 × 188 cm, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa

    On 4 November 1576, unpaid soldiers of the Spanish Army of Flanders mutinied and sacked Antwerp, killing thousands of citizens and burning hundreds of houses in what became known as the Spanish Fury. The proximate cause was arrears: the Genoese banking families who managed the financial transfers between Madrid and the Army of Flanders had not delivered payment, and troops who had gone unpaid for months eventually took what they were owed from the city itself (Drelichman and Voth, 2014). Eight years before that, in 1568, Jan Rubens, a Calvinist lawyer, had already left Antwerp during the Duke of Alba’s broader repression of the southern Netherlands, settling eventually in Cologne where he died in 1587. His widow Maria Pypelincks brought their son Peter Paul back to Antwerp in 1589, four years after Alessandro Farnese (1545–1592) had reconquered the city for Spain, completing a process that drove more than half of Antwerp’s Protestant population north to the emerging Dutch Republic and definitively reestablished the southern provinces as a Catholic Habsburg territory (Parker, 1977). What followed was not simply a political consolidation but also a cultural one. Under the Archdukes Albert (1559–1621) and Isabella Clara Eugenia (1566–1633), who governed the reconquered southern Netherlands as joint sovereigns from Brussels from 1598, the Spanish Netherlands became one of the most artistically productive territories in Europe: Brussels the seat of a sophisticated Habsburg court, Antwerp the commercial and artistic capital of northern Catholicism (Raeymaekers, 2013). Rubens’s entire formation took place within this Catholic humanist world, and when he left for Italy in May 1600, he carried it with him. In 1606 he was in Genoa at the financial heart of the imperial network that had made that world possible.

    The Republic of Genoa occupied a specific and consequential position within the Spanish imperial order. Formally independent, it functioned in practice as a protected state of the Habsburg crown, its great families the principal creditors of the Spanish military apparatus through dense networks of asiento loan contracts advanced against American silver revenues (Parker, 1972). The relationship was one of mutual advantage rather than subordination: Genoa needed Spanish protection against French and Ottoman threats while Spain needed Genoese capital to sustain military operations its own revenues could not fund.

    The city had its own developed artistic culture, rooted in the monumental fresco tradition that Luca Cambiaso (1527–1585) had established in the previous century and continued in the generation of painters Rubens encountered there, including Bernardo Castello (1557–1629) and Giovanni Battista Paggi (1554–1627) (Büttner and Orlando, 2022). Its ruling families bought the best available European painting with the appetite that extraordinary wealth permits. What they had not developed to the same degree was a portrait format adequate to their specific social position: immensely powerful republican bankers without hereditary titles, operating outside the ceremonial structures through which monarchical courts organised and displayed aristocratic prestige. They needed a portrait language that could project authority without depending on the apparatus of a court to frame it, and that would be legible to the Spanish grandees they financed and the northern European elites with whom they traded.

    Rubens had visited Genoa on several occasions between 1600 and 1607, sometimes accompanying Vincenzo I Gonzaga (1562–1612), Duke of Mantua, in whose service he held the position of court painter (Jaffé, 1977; Büttner and Orlando, 2022). His engagement with the city ran across several registers simultaneously. He painted two altarpieces for the Jesuit church, the Circumcision and the Miracles of Saint Ignatius, which remain in the Chiesa del Gesù to this day. He was drawing the palaces and villas of the city’s ruling families throughout these visits, a project he completed and published at his own expense in Antwerp in 1622 as Palazzi di Genova [Palaces of Genoa], a book of engravings illustrating thirty-one palaces and four churches of the Genoese Renaissance through which he presented himself to northern Europe as a connoisseur of architecture and urban design alongside his work as a painter (Rott, 2002). His longest single stay was in 1606, when he produced three works for Giovanni Carlo Doria and his immediate family circle of which the equestrian portrait is the most significant.

    Giovanni Carlo Doria (1576–1625) was the son of Agostino Doria, who had served as Doge of Genoa between 1601 and 1603, and his family connections ran directly through the most active nodes of the Spanish imperial network. His future wife Veronica Spinola, whom he would marry in June 1608, was the daughter of Ambrogio Spinola (1569–1630), who in 1602 had signed a contract with Philip III (1578–1621) to personally raise and fund approximately nine thousand men for service in Flanders, arriving with them largely at his own expense, and who in 1606, the year of this portrait, traveled to Madrid and pledged his entire personal estate as collateral to persuade Genoese lenders to extend further credit for the Dutch war (Drelichman and Voth, 2014). Spinola was never repaid and died in financial ruin. The three relationships at work in this portrait, the Genoese republican oligarchy, the Spanish crown, and the military operations in Flanders, were not separate contexts but aspects of a single system, and the Doria family stood at its intersection.

    The specific occasion for the commission was the formal royal announcement, on 8 July 1606, of Philip III’s intention to confer the Order of Santiago on Doria. The Order was a Spanish military-religious institution historically associated with the Reconquista, whose conferral on a Genoese republican nobleman was a formal act of integration into the Habsburg imperial hierarchy, acknowledging the Doria family’s position as active participants in rather than merely creditors of the Spanish imperial order. The investiture process had been in motion since around 1603, the July announcement was its first formal royal confirmation, and the Order’s statutes required it to be communicated within thirty days (Musei di Genova, n.d.). The portrait was commissioned in that window. Doria would not receive the white habit of the Order until 1610, nor the full robes of his final investiture until 28 December 1612. The red cruciform sword of the Order appears on his cuirass but without the habit, because the habit had not yet been conferred. It is a portrait of anticipated integration: a claim staked at the precise moment the crown made it publicly available, addressed to an audience capable of reading the cross on the armour and understanding its significance within the Spanish imperial system (Musei di Genova, n.d.).

    The compositional formula Rubens brought to this commission he had first developed three years earlier in the Duke of Lerma (1603, Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid), painted during his diplomatic mission for the Gonzagas to the court of Philip III in 1603 to 1604, and identified in the Corpus Rubenianum as the direct predecessor of the Doria portrait (Vlieghe, 1977). Both adapt Titian’s (c.1488–1576) Equestrian Portrait of Charles V (1548, Prado) by pulling the rider forward directly toward the viewer rather than processing him laterally across the picture plane in the manner of a classical frieze. In the Doria portrait, the viewpoint is set slightly low; the white horse rears against a sky that darkens behind the figure and opens to light above; Doria holds the reins in his left hand and a baton of command in his right; a hound leaps at the lower right. The rider arrives rather than presents himself: authority expressed through forward motion and physical energy, suited to families whose power was dynamic, transactional, and commercially grounded rather than inherited and ceremonial.

    The Doria equestrian was not an isolated commission but part of a cluster of Genoese portrait work that Rubens produced during his 1606 stay. In the same year he painted the Marchesa Brigida Spinola Doria (National Gallery of Art, Washington), a full-length female portrait for a different branch of the Doria family commissioned by her husband Marchese Giacomo Massimiliano Doria on the occasion of their 1605 marriage, applying comparable visual grandeur to the female portrait format and establishing for the Genoese noblewomen a language as new as the equestrian formula was for their husbands. The Palazzi di Genova, published sixteen years after the visit and funded by Rubens himself, confirms that his engagement with Genoa was sustained and serious: he had read the city as a coherent social and architectural world and made himself its most consequential artistic interpreter at precisely the moment when that world was at the height of its European power.

    In 1609, three years after the Doria portrait, Rubens accepted appointment as court painter to the Archdukes Albert and Isabella in Brussels. The painter who had worked in Genoa for the Spanish crown’s principal creditors was now court painter to the Spanish crown’s own governors of the southern Netherlands, and the continuity is as significant as it might appear contradictory. The Catholic humanist formation that had shaped his Italian years, his service to the Gonzaga court, his work for the Genoese aristocracy, and his eventual Antwerp appointment were all aspects of a single interconnected imperial cultural world in the early stages of the Baroque century it would produce. The portrait language he developed in Genoa for republican bankers without hereditary titles served equally the Habsburg court painters and their patrons, because the authority he had learned to project through paint was not feudal or monarchical but personal, physical, and forward-looking: the authority of someone who has somewhere to go.

    The painting passed by descent through the Doria family to Princess Doria d’Angri of Naples, where it remained until approximately 1850. In 1940, on the suggestion of Benito Mussolini (1883–1945), it was transferred to Adolf Hitler (1889–1945), destined for the Führermuseum planned for Linz, its location recorded in the Allied art recovery database under the reference LI001983 (Musei di Genova, n.d.). It was returned to Italy on 16 November 1948, exhibited at the Palazzo Vecchio in Florence until 1985, held in storage at the Museo di Capodimonte in Naples until 1988, and definitively assigned to the Galleria Nazionale di Palazzo Spinola in Genoa in that year. It had been absent from the city for nearly half a century.

    Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640), Equestrian Portrait of Giancarlo Doria, 1606, Oil on canvas, 265 × 188 cm, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa
    Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640), Equestrian Portrait of Giancarlo Doria, 1606, Oil on canvas, 265 × 188 cm, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa
    Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640), Equestrian Portrait of Giancarlo Doria, 1606, Oil on canvas, 265 × 188 cm, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa
    Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640), Equestrian Portrait of Giancarlo Doria, 1606, Oil on canvas, 265 × 188 cm, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa

    References

    Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640), Equestrian Portrait of Giancarlo Doria, 1606, Oil on canvas, 265 × 188 cm, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa

    Art History News (2020) ‘Background: Art in Genoa, 1600–1750’. Available at: https://arthistorynewsreport.blogspot.com/2020/03/a-superb-baroque-art-in-genoa-16001750.html (Accessed: 4 October 2024).

    Büttner, N. and Orlando, A. (eds.) (2022) Rubens in Genoa. Milan: Electa

    Drelichman, M. and Voth, H.J. (2014) Lending to the Borrower from Hell: Debt, Taxes, and Default in the Age of Philip II. Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Galleria Nazionale di Palazzo Spinola (n.d.) Rubens, Equestrian Portrait of Giovanni Carlo Doria, 1606, inv. 1975. Available at: https://palazzospinola.beniculturali.it (Accessed: 4 October 2024)

    Jaffé, M. (1977) Rubens and Italy. Oxford: Phaidon

    Musei di Genova (n.d.) ‘Equestrian Portrait of Giovanni Carlo Doria’. Available at: https://museidigenova.it (Accessed: 4 October 2024).

    Parker, G. (1972) The Army of Flanders and the Spanish Road, 1567–1659. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Parker, G. (1977) The Dutch Revolt. London: Allen Lane.

    Raeymaekers, D. (2013) One Foot in the Palace: The Habsburg Court of Brussels and the Politics of Access in the Reign of Albert and Isabella, 1598–1621. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    RKD – Netherlands Institute for Art History (n.d.) Rubens, Equestrian Portrait of Giovanni Carlo Doria, 1606. RKDimages, image no. 222959. The Hague: RKD – Netherlands Institute for Art History. Available at: https://rkd.nl/en/explore/images/222959 (Accessed: 4 October 2024).

    Rott, H.W. (2002) Palazzi di Genova. Corpus Rubenianum Ludwig Burchard, Part XXII. London: Harvey Miller.

    Vergara, A. (ed.) (2002) Baroque Painting in Genoa. London: National Gallery Company

    Vlieghe, H. (1977) Rubens: Portraits, Part I. Corpus Rubenianum Ludwig Burchard, Part XIX, 1. London: Harvey Miller

    Warfare History Network (n.d.) ‘Ambrogio di Spinola’. Available at: https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/ambrogio-di-spinola (Accessed: 4 October 2024).

  • Domenico Fiasella, called Il Sarzana (1589 – 1669) and his pupil Giovanni Battista Casoni (1610- 1686), ‘Diana and Endymion’, 1640

     Domenico Fiasella, called Il Sarzana (1589 – 1669) and his pupil Giovanni Battista Casoni (1610- 1686), Diana and Endymion, 1640, Oil on canvas, 184x 235 cm, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa

    Domenico Fiasella, called Il Sarzana (1589 – 1669) and his pupil Giovanni Battista Casoni (1610- 1686), Diana and Endymion, 1640, Oil on canvas, 184x 235 cm, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa

    In the past, the painting was misattributed to Luca Giordano (1634-1705), but archival evidence in Genoa has confirmed it to be the work of Domenico Fiasella, with contributions from his student and brother-in-law, Giovanni Battista Casoni. Commissioned by Agostino Pallavicino, a major local art patron of the era, this painting was part of a series of three secular love scenes, including Rinaldo and Armida and Tancredi with Clorinda.

    Fiasella painted the figures of Diana and Endymion, while Casoni added the amorini (small, winged cupids), illustrating their collaborative approach. The composition employs chiaroscuro, creating a soft, candlelit atmosphere that captures Diana’s loving gaze as she watches over the sleeping Endymion. This play of light and shadow enhances the emotional depth, aligning with Baroque art’s focus on drama and sensuality.

    The iconography draws from Greco-Roman mythology, depicting Diana as both goddess of the hunt and moon. Her crescent crown, along with her bow and arrow, signify her divine authority, while her tender gaze reveals a rare vulnerability. The amorini symbolise divine love, and sleeping dogs at Endymion’s feet convey loyalty, adding a sense of peace to the scene.

    In the myth, the powerful goddess fell in love with the mortal Endymion, whose beauty the gods preserved by granting him eternal sleep. Diana descends to watch over him each night, captivated by his youthful beauty and serenity. Her crescent crown symbolises her celestial nature, and Endymion’s slumber represents purity and innocence, making him an idealised and unattainable object of Diana’s affection. This portrayal encapsulates the theme of unattainable love, a central motif in Baroque art.

    Domenico Fiasella, called Il Sarzana (1589 – 1669) and his pupil Giovanni Battista Casoni (1610- 1686), Diana and Endymion, 1640, Oil on canvas, 184x 235 cm, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa
    Domenico Fiasella, called Il Sarzana (1589 – 1669) and his pupil Giovanni Battista Casoni (1610- 1686), Diana and Endymion, 1640, Oil on canvas, 184x 235 cm, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa
  • Ansaldo Pallavicino by Antoon Van Dyck (1599–1641) Fragment of a Lost Family Portrait

    Antoon van Dyck (1599–1641), Portrait of  Ansaldo Pallavicino (1607–1636), c.1625, Oil on canvas, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa

    Antoon van Dyck (1599–1641), Portrait of  Ansaldo Pallavicino (1607–1636), c.1625, Oil on canvas, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa
    Antoon van Dyck (1599–1641), Portrait of  Ansaldo Pallavicino (1607–1636), c.1625, Oil on canvas, Palazzo Spinola, Genoa

    This portrait, painted by Antoon Van Dyck around 1625, was originally part of a larger family composition featuring Ansaldo Pallavicino alongside his father, Agostino Pallavicino (1577–1649), who was, for a time, the Doge of the Republic of Genoa and King of Corsica—a somewhat curious title, as the Genoese Bank of Saint George owned Corsica. In the 18th century, however, the canvas was cut, leaving only this solitary image of Ansaldo. The exact reason for this division remains uncertain; it may have been due to inheritance issues or damage to the original work. Even in the 18th century, Van Dyck’s portraits held significant value, so preserving part of this painting was likely seen as worthwhile.

    The portrait’s current fragmented state adds an element of mystery, hinting at the original father-son narrative now lost to us. This image of Ansaldo alone still reflects Van Dyck’s grand style, usually reserved for mature sitters but here applied to a younger subject, lending Ansaldo an air of grace and dignity. Van Dyck depicted him as a symbol of his family’s future, with a touch of Renaissance melancholy suggesting the weight of noble expectations.

    In this fragment, Van Dyck’s refined brushwork and sophisticated detail are evident, capturing the dignified presence that made his portraits admired across Europe. Even as a single figure, the painting embodies Van Dyck’s talent for conveying elegance and depth, preserving a glimpse of the artist’s original vision.

  • Agnolo di Cosimo, called il Bronzino (1503- 1572), ‘Portrait of Andrea Doria (1466- 1560) as the God of the Sea’, c. 1545-46

     Agnolo di Cosimo, called il Bronzino (1503- 1572), Portrait of Andrea Doria (1466- 1560) as the God of the Sea, c. 1545-46,  Oil on canvas, 115 x 53 cm, Villa del Principe / Palazzo di Andrea Doria, Genoa

    Agnolo di Cosimo, called il Bronzino (1503- 1572), Portrait of Andrea Doria (1466- 1560) as the God of the Sea, c. 1545-46,  Oil on canvas, 115 x 53 cm, Villa del Principe / Palazzo di Andrea Doria, Genoa

    This portrait of Andrea Doria as Neptune goes beyond typical depictions of state figures, serving as a multi-layered political allegory. Strategically positioned on the Mediterranean, the Genoese Republic was frequently caught between rival powers such as Spain, France, and the Ottoman Empire. Doria’s service to Emperor Charles V helped secure Genoa’s independence through strategic alliances. As a naval commander, Doria’s campaigns against the French and Ottoman forces were significant, but it was his efforts against Barbary pirates that ensured the safety of Genoa’s merchant fleet, which was vital to the city’s economy.

    In the 16th century, North African pirates devastated the Mediterranean coasts, rendering large areas uninhabitable. Only walled cities like Genoa provided refuge from raids and enslavement. Doria’s naval victories were crucial for securing maritime routes and ensuring Genoa’s survival and prosperity.

    The portrait captures Doria in his old age, reflecting on his decades-long career. Bronzino’s allegorical portrayal symbolises Doria’s command over the seas and his essential role in protecting Genoa’s trade routes. Andrea Doria is depicted in heroic nudity as Neptune, holding an oar instead of Neptune’s traditional trident. This detail sets the portrait apart from Bronzino’s earlier version for Paolo Giovio’s Museum of Famous Men in Milan. The design, which became iconic, also inspired a monumental fountain commissioned from Baccio Bandinelli (1493–1560) for Genoa, although it was never transported from Carrara and remains there to this day.

  • Guercino (1591–1666): Cleopatra’s Last Act — Tragedy with Grace

    Giovanni Francesco Barbieri known as il Guercino (1591–1666)(1591 – 1666), The dying Cleopatra, c.1648, Oil on canvas, 173×237 cm, Palazzo Rosso, Genoa

    Giovanni Francesco Barbieri known as il Guercino (1591–1666) (1591 – 1666), The dying Cleopatra, c.1648, Oil on canvas, 173×237 cm, Palazzo Rosso, Genoa

    Known in his youth for dramatic chiaroscuro and emotionally charged figures, Guercino evolved towards a more classicist, idealised approach after moving to Bologna and following the death of Guido Reni in 1642. This stylistic shift reflected his ambition to appeal to patrons favouring the polished, restrained aesthetic of the Bolognese school, renowned for its harmonious compositions, softened chromatic choices, and a sense of serene grandeur.

    In this painting, Cleopatra’s death is portrayed with both elegance and restraint. Guercino reduces his palette to two primary tones: the pale, alabaster white of Cleopatra’s skin and bedding and the deep, regal purples of the drapery and cushions. The arrangement resembles a theatrical stage, with the curtain draped like a ‘wall,’ heightening the solemnity of the scene. This approach imbues Cleopatra’s death with a sense of tragic nobility.

    Reclining languidly, Cleopatra embodies sensuality even in her final moments, as she succumbs to the bite of the asp. The wound on her breast reveals only two tiny ruby drops of blood, symbolising both her defiance and control over her fate. Reflecting Plutarch’s accounts and the iconography of Cleopatra’s self-inflicted death, the snake signifies royal authority and chosen destiny—an act that preserves her sovereignty by avoiding capture and degradation.

    This composition is monumental yet refined, with Cleopatra’s serene expression and muted colour scheme reinforcing the stoic dignity of her final act. The theatrical yet dignified presentation of Cleopatra’s death scene marks this work as a signature piece from Guercino’s late period, characterised by restrained emotionality, softened colours, and a timeless idealisation that distances it from his earlier nocturne scenes.

  • Chiesa di San Donato (Church of Saint Donatus)

    San Donato Church in Genoa is an exceptional example of 12th-century Ligurian Romanesque architecture. The façade, built from local limestone, is marked by a black-and-white banded portal and an architrave re-used from a Roman structure, a detail that underscores the continuity between the city’s classical past and its medieval present. Although the church has undergone several reconstructions, its original character has been preserved through the careful incorporation of surviving medieval fabric. The destruction of later additions during the Second World War left the core Romanesque structure largely intact, allowing its early form to be read with unusual clarity.

    One of its most distinctive features is the octagonal bell tower, or nolar tower, integrated directly into the body of the church—an arrangement rare in Genoa. The tower is enriched with sawtooth friezes and a triple register of bifore and trifore windows, lending vertical rhythm to its mass. Within, the church follows a basilican plan with three naves, each ending in its own apse. The arcades are supported by twelve columns, six of them monolithic shafts of Roman origin reused from the earlier building, while the others, fashioned in alternating black and white stone and capped with Romanesque capitals, belong to later phases of construction, particularly those dating to the closing decades of the twelfth century. The pillars that uphold the tiburio also belong to the earliest fabric, providing a structural link to the building’s first phase.

    Among the works preserved within is the Madonna del Latte by Barnaba da Modena, painted in the fourteenth century. Barnaba (c. 1328–1386) was among the leading figures of the early Genoese school, his style blending Lombard, Tuscan, and Byzantine influences. His impact endured well into the fifteenth century, shaping the work of local painters and securing his place in the city’s artistic lineage.

    Chiesa di San Donato (Church of Saint Donatus), Genoa.
    Chiesa di San Donato (Church of Saint Donatus), Genoa.
    Chiesa di San Donato (Church of Saint Donatus), Genoa
    Chiesa di San Donato (Church of Saint Donatus), Genoa
    Chiesa di San Donato (Church of Saint Donatus), Genoa
    Chiesa di San Donato (Church of Saint Donatus), Genoa
    Chiesa di San Donato (Church of Saint Donatus), Genoa
    Chiesa di San Donato (Church of Saint Donatus), Genoa

    References

    Whitfield, P. (2020) Historic Churches of Genoa: A Brief Guide. Genoa: Peter Whitfield


  • Galleria degli Specchi (Hall of Mirrors) at Genoa’s Palazzo Reale

    Galleria degli Specchi in Genoa’s Palazzo Reale looks like a finely judged adaptation of Versailles’ celebrated Hall of Mirrors to an Italian, and specifically Genoese, setting. From the late seventeenth century the Galerie des Glaces at the Palace of Versailles, commissioned by King Louis XIV and designed by Jules Hardouin-Mansart (1646–1708) with decorative schemes by Charles Le Brun (1619–1690), had redefined the standards of ceremonial architecture in Europe. Its mirrored walls, gilded stuccoes, and mythological cycles became a model eagerly emulated by courts and aristocratic households from Madrid to St Petersburg.

    In Genoa, the Durazzo family sought to capture this aura of magnificence when, between about 1720 and 1730, they commissioned Domenico Parodi (1672–1742) to design their own Galleria degli Specchi. Parodi adopted Versailles’ essential vocabulary of repeated mirrors, rich gilding, and a carefully orchestrated play of reflected light, but he tempered it with Ligurian sensibilities. The proportions were adapted to the palazzo’s existing structure, and the decorative programme was enriched with local motifs that linked the gallery to Genoa’s artistic traditions.

    The work was completed by Lorenzo De Ferrari (1680–1744), whose frescoes introduced a sequence of mythological scenes that, like Le Brun’s paintings at Versailles, conveyed allegorical messages of power and virtue. His fluid brushwork and luminous palette created a ceiling scheme that both complemented the architecture and animated the mirrored surfaces below.

    Galleria degli Specchi (Hall of Mirrors) at Genoa’s Palazzo Reale
    Galleria degli Specchi (Hall of Mirrors) at Genoa’s Palazzo Reale
    Galleria degli Specchi (Hall of Mirrors) at Genoa’s Palazzo Reale
    Galleria degli Specchi (Hall of Mirrors) at Genoa’s Palazzo Reale
    Galleria degli Specchi (Hall of Mirrors) at Genoa’s Palazzo Reale
    Galleria degli Specchi (Hall of Mirrors) at Genoa’s Palazzo Reale
    Galleria degli Specchi (Hall of Mirrors) at Genoa’s Palazzo Reale
    Galleria degli Specchi (Hall of Mirrors) at Genoa’s Palazzo Reale
  • The Magdalene’s Parish: Piety and Pleasure in the Caruggi of Genoa

    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa

    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa

    Genoa has always been difficult to read from the outside. Squeezed between the mountains and the Ligurian Sea on a narrow coastal strip, its character was formed less by the Italian peninsula behind it than by the Mediterranean in front. For centuries, it looked outward. Early modern visitors called it il porto del mondo [the port of the world], and the Latin inscription on the twelfth-century Porta Soprana, the city’s surviving medieval gate, still welcomes those who come in peace and warns off those who come for war. Francesco Petrarch (1304–1374), passing through in 1358 on his way to the Holy Land, noted the collision of mountains and water, sea grandeur pressed against confinement, and gave the city the epithet that stuck: la Superba [the Superb]. It was during its golden age as banker to the Spanish crown in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries that the name came to mean what most people associate with it. Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640), who visited on several occasions between 1600 and 1607 as court painter to the Duke of Mantua, was so struck by the palaces of the Strada Nuova that he published a folio of architectural drawings in Antwerp in 1622, Palazzi di Genova, explicitly proposing the Genoese model as worthy of imitation across northern Europe. Rubens was captivated by a city whose ruling families housed visiting dignitaries in their private residences by lot, drawn from official civic registers called the Rolli, and whose bankers held the finances of the Spanish empire. In Bruges, the old Genoese consular lodge still stands. In Rome, the port district of Ripa Grande was controlled by Genoese merchants, and the Trastevere was populated by Ligurian sailors. A recent exhibition at Genoa’s medieval hospital, the Commenda di Prè, took as its title Nessuno si sente straniero a Genova [No One Feels a Stranger in Genoa]. The phrase captures something real about a place whose prosperity depended on welcoming people and goods from everywhere, and whose pragmatism about human behaviour was correspondingly broad.

    That pragmatism extended to matters the Republic’s rivals preferred to handle with more hypocrisy. Via della Maddalena runs as an inner parallel to Via Garibaldi, the street Rubens had drawn. The proximity is almost satirical. Behind the marble facades and frescoed saloni [reception halls] of the aristocracy, the quarter that gave the Maddalena church its name was the principal site of Genoa’s sex trade, a trade inseparable from the port economy. Genoa was a city of sailors, camalli [dockworkers], and transient foreign merchants. The Republic’s administration handled the matter with the unsentimental bookkeeping instinct for which the Genoese were known throughout Europe. Prostitution was not a marginal activity tolerated in the shadows; it was a regulated civic function, outsourced by contract every five years and treated as a source of public revenue. Registered courtesans paid a daily tax of five genovini [Genoese coins] to the treasury. They did not work on Saturdays. Sumptuary laws made their status visible: they were required to wear yellow, a colour that across Italian city-states served as a mark of social exclusion (it was also imposed on Jewish communities in medieval Europe). Between the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the designated area of their trade was formally circumscribed within the caruggi [narrow alleys] close to the harbour, bounded by what were effectively zoning borders, the locations of which are still marked in the modern city by speed bumps where gates once stood.

    The church of Santa Maria Maddalena sat at the centre of this arrangement, and its role in the community’s life was anything but incidental. It was the institutional hinge between the regulated commerce of the flesh and the spiritual obligations that the Republic imposed on those who practised it. Registered courtesans were required to attend Sunday Mass here, the Magdalene being their assigned patron saint, a figure whose biblical narrative of repentance the authorities evidently considered instructive. On the feast of Saint John the Baptist, 24 June, the city’s patron day, the women were further obliged to walk in public religious procession through the caruggi, following behind the image of the Magdalene. This was a public ritual of incorporation and exclusion performed simultaneously: the courtesans were part of the civic body enough to be taxed, regulated, and paraded, but marked out by dress and procession as a class apart. Was this humiliation dressed as devotion, or devotion dressed as social control? What mattered was that the arrangement functioned. The courtesans attended Mass alongside the families, dockworkers, and merchants who made up the rest of the parish. Their contributions helped finance the church itself, and local tradition holds, plausibly if unverifiably, that much of the gilded interior was paid for by the clients of the surrounding streets, purchasing spiritual insurance with the profits of the trade. The Maddalena was, in practice, the parish church of an entire neighbourhood whose economic and moral life were openly entangled in ways that the Republic’s officials regulated but never pretended did not exist. The folk memory of those Sunday processions persisted long after the Republic fell, entering Italian popular song and literature.

    A chapel on the site is documented from around 1150, positioned along the old Roman road that ran through this part of the city. In 1480, it was made a commenda [a church placed under the governance of a monastic or knightly order]. By 1572, it had been elevated to parish status and assigned to the Theatine fathers, who did not stay long, moving within a few years to a larger basilica. In 1576, Pope Gregory XIII (r. 1572–1585) transferred the church to the Somaschi fathers, the order founded by the Venetian soldier-turned-humanitarian Gerolamo Emiliani (1486–1537). The choice was pointed, even if the historical record does not spell out the reasoning. Emiliani, canonised in 1767 and declared patron saint of orphans by Pope Pius XI in 1928, had spent his life after his conversion caring for abandoned children and the destitute across the cities of northern Italy, establishing orphanages at Brescia, Bergamo, Como, and Milan. At Bergamo, he had also founded a hostel specifically for repentant prostitutes. His order, formally approved by Pope Paul III in 1540 and constituted as the Ordo Clericorum Regularium a Somascha [Order of Clerics Regular of Somasca] by Pius V in 1568, was defined by its work at the intersection of poverty, abandonment, and the sex trade. That such an order was given charge of a parish surrounded by active brothels was not coincidence but Counter-Reformation strategy: embedding charitable care precisely where it was most needed, placing priests experienced in the consequences of the flesh trade at the heart of the district that generated those consequences. The Somaschi established one of their three Italian novitiates in Genoa. At the Maddalena, their work was both pastoral and practical. They baptised the children of the quarter, including children whose parentage the parish registers may have recorded with some discretion. They heard confessions from the women of the surrounding streets, from the sailors who were their clients, and from the families who lived among both. In a neighbourhood where the boundaries between respectable and disreputable were a matter of a few metres, the Somaschi served as the common institution through which the entire population, however the rest of the city regarded them, participated in the sacramental life of the Church.

    The Somaschi began rebuilding, commissioning Andrea Ceresola (active c.1580–c.1619), known as il Vannone, the Lombard-born architect who simultaneously held the title of architetto camerale [superintendent of public works] for the Republic. Ceresola, who was also redesigning the Palazzo Ducale in Genoa and building the extraordinary raised church of San Pietro in Banchi nearby (a building constructed above commercial premises, its construction financed by the sale of shops beneath the nave, a marriage of the sacred and the mercantile that could only have been conceived in Genoa), signed the contract for the Maddalena in 1585. He reoriented the building to improve access from the Strada Nuova and completed the main body by around 1587, producing a single-nave church. In 1635, a substantial renovation transformed the interior, introducing twin columns to divide the nave into three sections and raising a high dome over the transept crossing. The current structure was essentially complete by 1661.

    Through the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the church accumulated an unusually rich decorative programme for a building of its size. Sebastiano Galeotti (1656–1746), a Florentine painter who worked extensively across northern Italy and was also active in the nearby Palazzo Spinola, frescoed the dome, nave, presbytery, and apse in 1729, including a Gloria di Santa Maria Maddalena above the congregation. Sigismondo Betti (1700–1783) painted the transept frescoes in 1737, depicting scenes from the life of Gerolamo Emiliani, the order’s founder, whose mission to orphans and repentant women was thus given visual form directly above the parish he had been sent, in effect, to serve. Giovanni Battista Parodi (1674–1730), his brother Domenico Parodi (1672–1742), and Paolo Gerolamo Piola (1666–1724) all contributed works, as did Giovanni Battista Casone (1655–1728), Giuseppe Palmieri (1674–1740), and Giacomo Antonio Boni (1688–1766). Domenico Parodi provided frescoes of the Marriage and Nativity of the Virgin and the Assumption, while Palmieri and Boni worked on Trinity and Angels and Passion subjects. The cumulative effect is striking for so compact a church: a Baroque interior thick with gilded stucco and painted ceilings, all of it enclosed in a building embedded in an alley network that, even in broad daylight, carries the atmosphere of a world that has never quite submitted to respectability.

    The Maddalena quarter remains what it has been for centuries. The caruggi around Via della Maddalena still carry, alongside the art galleries, focaccerie [flatbread bakeries], and edicole votive [devotional wall shrines] set into the walls between buildings, the visible presence of sex workers, many of them now from communities far beyond Liguria. Genoa was absorbed into the Kingdom of Sardinia by the Congress of Vienna in 1815, against the wishes of its population, and folded into the unified Italian state in 1861, but it has never quite belonged to the nation that claimed it. Its dialect, its mercantile instincts, its refusal of the pastoral Italian idyll in favour of port grit and mountain claustrophobia: all of this persists. The church of the Maddalena sits in the middle of that persistence, its Somaschi fathers still in residence after four and a half centuries, still tending a parish whose boundaries encompass exactly the same contradictions that Gerolamo Emiliani’s order was sent here to address. The Magdalene’s tears, in Genoa, have always fallen on complicated ground.

    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa
    Chiesa di Santa Maria Maddalena, Genoa

    References

    Epstein, S.A. (1996) Genoa and the Genoese, 958–1528. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Howie, E. (2024) ‘Sumptuary Laws, Gender, and Public Dressing in Early Modern Genoa’, The Historical Journal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/historical-journal/article/sumptuary-laws-gender-and-public-dressing-in-early-modern-genoa/99F01BDBC1BF7BE5DEBEFB72A09F076E (Accessed: 1 October 2024).

    Poleggi, E. and Motta, T. (2009) Genoa: The Strade Nuove and the System of the Palazzi dei Rolli. Genoa: Sagep

    Stevens Crawshaw, J.L. (2019) Cleaning Up Renaissance Italy: Environmental Ideals and Urban Practice in Genoa and Venice. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Treccani (n.d.) ‘Ceresola, Andrea, detto il Vannone’, Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani [Biographical Dictionary of Italians]. Available at: https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/ceresola-andrea-detto-il-vannone_(Dizionario-Biografico)/ (Accessed: 1 October 2024).

    Whitfield, P. (2020) Historic Churches of Genoa: A Brief Guide. Genoa: Peter Whitfield

  • Perino del Vaga, Frescoes of the Entrance Hall c. 1529–1530, Villa del Principe (Palazzo del Principe), Genoa

    The entrance hall’s frescoes and decorations constitute an interesting exercise in political allegory, one rooted in the particular pressures of sixteenth-century Genoa. The seaside entry presents scenes of the seven legendary kings of Rome, a sequence that speaks less to abstract notions of leadership than to the specific problem facing the Doria family: how to preserve the Genoese Republic’s independence when the balance of European power was in constant flux, and when the wrong alliance could prove fatal.

    Perino del Vaga (1501–1547), invited by Andrea Doria in 1527, began work on Villa del Principe in 1529, drawing visibly on Giulio Romano’s decorative programme at the Palazzo Te in Mantua. Completed around 1530, the frescoes combine mythological and historical subjects within an elaborate framework of arabesques and stucco ornament.

    The Doria’s position in this period was precarious rather than triumphant, and the pictorial programme reflects that. Andrea Doria (1466–1560) had steered Genoa away from French dependency and towards a new compact with Spain, a realignment that secured the city’s autonomy, at least for a time. The Triumph of Lucius Aemilius Paullus, the Roman general who expelled the Gauls, translates this achievement into classical terms: the French are the Gauls; Doria, implicitly, is the Roman commander who removed them.

    The choice of the seven Roman kings carries its own weight. As a sequence, they embody the full range of royal virtue and failure that Roman tradition had elaborated over centuries, a reminder that authority is neither stable nor self-sustaining. The faded lunettes depicting Mars and Venus, together with the pendentives of the seven kings, draw divine forces into this political theatre, suggesting that the fortunes of the republic are subject to more than merely human calculation.

    Perino del Vaga, Frescoes of the Entrance Hall c. 1529–1530, Villa del Principe (Palazzo del Principe), Genoa
    Villa del Principe in Genoa.The entrance hall’s frescoes.
    Villa del Principe in Genoa.The entrance hall’s frescoes.
    Villa del Principe in Genoa.The entrance hall’s frescoes.
    Perino del Vaga, Frescoes of the Entrance Hall c. 1529–1530, Villa del Principe (Palazzo del Principe), Genoa
    Villa del Principe in Genoa.The entrance hall’s frescoes.

    References

    Stagno, L. (2005) Palazzo del Principe: The Villa of Andrea Doria, Sagep,University of Genoa, Available at, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260477911_PALAZZO_DEL_PRINCIPE (Accessed 3 October 2024)

  • Antoon van Dyck (1599–1641): The Dying Christ — An Early Genoese Prototype Revisited Across a Lifetime

     Antoon Van Dyck (1599 – 1641), Dying Christ, c.1620s, Oil on canvas, 124 x 93 cm, King’s bedroom, Palazzo Reale, Genoa

    Antoon Van Dyck (1599 – 1641), Dying Christ, c.1620s, Oil on canvas, 124 x 93 cm, King’s bedroom, Palazzo Reale, Genoa

    Antoon Van Dyck (1599 – 1641), Dying Christ, c.1620s, Oil on canvas, 124 x 93 cm, King’s bedroom, Palazzo Reale, Genoa

    Van Dyck grew up in a deeply religious Catholic household. His father, Frans, a prosperous Antwerp silk merchant, served as president of the lay Confraternity of the Holy Sacrament. His brother Theodorus became a priest at Minderhout; his sisters Susanna, Cornelia and Isabella entered the béguinage, and a fourth sister, Anna, took vows as a nun. After his return from Italy in 1627, Van Dyck himself enrolled in the Jesuit-directed Confraternity of Bachelors, and in 1629 painted a large Crucifixion with St Dominic and St Catherine of Siena for the Dominican church in Antwerp as an epitaph for his recently deceased father . Faith ran through Van Dyck’s family like a binding thread, and it is difficult to look at any of his Passion subjects without sensing something very personal.

    This painting, hung in the King’s Bedroom of the Palazzo Reale on the Via Balbi, is widely considered the only surviving autograph Crucifixion from Van Dyck’s Italian years. Nothing is known of its original commission or early provenance. It entered the palace only in 1833, having been purchased in 1821 by Carlo Felice of Sardinia from the collection of Carlo Andrea Gabaldoni. Its attribution has never been seriously challenged, and the date is placed around 1627, during or just after Van Dyck’s extended residence in Genoa.

    Christ is shown still alive, his bloodied face tilted upward, mouth open in what reads unmistakably as the cry of dereliction recorded in Matthew 27:46: Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani? There is no Virgin, no Magdalene, no mourning disciples gathered at the foot of the cross. He is entirely alone. A harsh, cold light picks out the musculature of his body and catches the elaborate loincloth, which twists as though caught by wind, lending the scene a raw physicality that Van Dyck, under Rubens’s influence, knew how to exploit without tipping into spectacle. Above the thorn-crowned head, a faint luminous glow competes with the darkening sky: the solar eclipse described by Luke (23:44–45), where darkness fell over the land from the sixth to the ninth hour and the sun’s light failed. The barren, rocky ground beneath the cross offers no consolation, only an emptiness that deepens the sense of abandonment.

    Van Dyck had been painting Crucifixion subjects since his late teens. Around 1617–19, while still assisting Rubens, he produced a Crucifixion with the Virgin, Saint John and Saint Mary Magdalene, later sold to Rubens himself in 1621 for the Jesuit church at Bergues, now in the Louvre. After returning from Italy, he revisited the theme repeatedly: for the Augustinian convent in Antwerp (a signed version dated 1627, now in the Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten), for the Récollets in Lille (c. 1630, now Palais des Beaux-Arts de Lille), and in numerous smaller panels and oil sketches intended for private devotion (including one in Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza). Several of these smaller compositions deliberately strip the scene to its barest elements: Christ alone on the cross, without attendant figures, confronting loneliness during his agony. It is a formula Van Dyck clearly found inexhaustible, returning to it across decades, adjusting scale and format but never quite leaving the subject behind. One might ask whether any other seventeenth-century painter was so persistently drawn to the isolated, suffering Christ, or whether the motif held for Van Dyck a private, confessional meaning that went beyond Counter-Reformation convention.

    The Genoa canvas is modest in size but not in effect. The foreshortened perspective pushes Christ’s body towards the viewer, a compositional device Van Dyck had absorbed from Rubens’s monumental altarpieces and from his own study of Venetian painting during the Italian years. His sketchbook, now in the British Museum, documents the intensity of his encounters with Titian and Veronese, and something of that Venetian warmth in the handling of flesh and fabric survives here, despite the bleakness of the subject . What separates this painting from Van Dyck’s later, more elaborated Crucifixion altarpieces is precisely its austerity. The absence of any secondary figures concentrates everything on the body and the face. There is no story being told around the edges, no weeping bystanders to direct the viewer’s sympathy. The viewer stands where Mary and John would have stood, and the painting offers no buffer.

    Whether Van Dyck intended this as a private devotional work or as something for a chapel or bedchamber, we cannot know. Its modest scale and its arrival in Genoa through a collector’s purchase rather than a church commission suggest it may always have been a cabinet painting, meant for close, solitary looking. If so, the intimacy of the encounter was the point: one person, alone with the dying Christ, in a room not so different from the one where it now hangs.


    References

    Barnes, S.J., De Poorter, N., Millar, O. and Vey, H. (2004) Van Dyck: A Complete Catalogue of the Paintings. New Haven and London: Yale University Press

    Glen, T.L. (1983) ‘Observations on van Dyck as a Religious Painter’, RACAR: Revue d’art canadienne / Canadian Art Review, 10(1), pp. 45–52. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42630976.(Accessed 1 October 2024)

    Liedtke, W.A. (2003) ‘Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640) and Anthony van Dyck (1599–1641): Paintings’, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Available at: https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/peter-paul-rubens-1577-1640-and-anthony-van-dyck-1599-1641-paintings.(Accessed 01 October 2024)

    Martin, J. and Feigenbaum, G. (1979) Van Dyck as Religious Artist. Princeton: The Art Museum, Princeton University

    Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza (n.d.) Christ on the Cross – Dyck, Anthony van. Available at: https://www.museothyssen.org/en/collection/artists/dyck-anthony-van/christ-cross (Accessed: 1 October 2024)