Month: October 2024

  • Lazzaro Tavarone (1556 – 1640), ‘Raffaele Adorno (1375- 1458) besieges the city of Tunis’, 1624

    Lazzaro Tavarone (1556 – 1640), Raffaele Adorno (1375- 1458) besieges the city of Tunis, 1624, Fresco, The central box of the vault on the ground floor, Palazzo Cattaneo-Adorno, Genoa 

    Lazzaro Tavarone (1556 – 1640), Raffaele Adorno (1375- 1458) besieges the city of Tunis, 1624, Fresco, The central box of the vault on the ground floor, Palazzo Cattaneo-Adorno, Genoa 
    Lazzaro Tavarone (1556 – 1640), Raffaele Adorno (1375- 1458) besieges the city of Tunis, 1624, Fresco, The central box of the vault on the ground floor, Palazzo Cattaneo-Adorno, Genoa 

    Lazzaro Tavarone trained under Luca Cambiaso (1527–1585), a significant figure in Genoese school who laid the groundwork for the widespread fresco decoration of Genoa’s public and private spaces. Cambiaso’s workshop introduced large-scale, high-quality frescoes and intricate facades that lent distinction to Genoa’s architecture. His influence inspired a generation of artists, including Giovanni Andrea Ansaldo, Simone Barabino, Giulio Benso, Battista and Bernardo Castello, Giovanni Battista Paggi, and Francesco Spezzini, all of whom carried on and expanded this tradition.

    This visual storytelling became a well-established local custom, with historical frescoes and architectural decorations serving as essential expressions of identity. Patrons, especially from Genoa’s oldest dynasties, embraced this art form to convey their role, power, heritage, and public duty. By depicting military victories and ancestral figures, these artworks linked family lineages to Genoa’s historical narratives, fostering public admiration and a sense of civic pride.

    Lazzaro Tavarone (1556 – 1640), Raffaele Adorno (1375- 1458) besieges the city of Tunis, 1624, Fresco, The central box of the vault on the ground floor, Palazzo Cattaneo-Adorno, Genoa 
    Lazzaro Tavarone (1556 – 1640), Raffaele Adorno (1375- 1458) besieges the city of Tunis, 1624, Fresco, The central box of the vault on the ground floor, Palazzo Cattaneo-Adorno, Genoa 
    Lazzaro Tavarone (1556 – 1640), Raffaele Adorno (1375- 1458) besieges the city of Tunis, 1624, Fresco, The central box of the vault on the ground floor, Palazzo Cattaneo-Adorno, Genoa 
    Lazzaro Tavarone (1556 – 1640), Raffaele Adorno (1375- 1458) besieges the city of Tunis, 1624, Fresco, The central box of the vault on the ground floor, Palazzo Cattaneo-Adorno, Genoa 
  • Mattia Preti’s Clorinda Frees Olindo and Sofronia from the Stake: A Baroque Response to Tasso’s Jerusalem Delivered and Its Appeal in an Age of Christian–Ottoman Conflict

    Mattia Preti (163-1699), Clorinda frees Olindo and Sofronia from the stake, c.1646, Oil on canvas, 248 x 245 cm, Palazzo Rosso, Genoa

    Mattia Preti (163-1699), Clorinda frees Olindo and Sofronia from the stake, c.1646, Oil on canvas, 248 x 245 cm, Palazzo Rosso, Genoa

    Torquato Tasso’s Jerusalem Delivered (1581) became one of the most celebrated literary works of early modern Europe, its dramatic episodes inspiring painters, and composers alike. The poem’s fusion of Christian heroism, passionate love, and supernatural intervention offered artists a rich repertoire of scenes that could be shaped into visual spectacle. Its resonance was heightened by Europe’s ongoing struggles with the Ottoman Empire, which gave new urgency to Tasso’s crusading narrative and lent contemporary meaning to its portrayals of conflict between faiths.

    In this early version, Mattia Preti crafted a highly original work that synthesised three artistic legacies he admired: the dramatic tenebrism of Caravaggio, the colouristic breadth of the Venetians, and the graceful idealism of the Bolognese school. Clorinda Frees Olindo and Sofronia from the Stake takes one of Tasso’s most theatrical episodes, where Sofronia, a Christian maiden, falsely confesses to a crime to save her people, and her lover Olindo insists on sharing her fate. Both are condemned to die by fire until Clorinda, a warrior-maiden in Aladine’s service, intervenes to win their release.

    Clorinda is one of Tasso’s most complex heroines: outwardly aligned with the Muslim forces yet consistently portrayed with nobility, courage, and compassion. In the poem she is described as a fearless warrior, but also as a figure of inner tension, destined for a dramatic conversion when, fatally wounded by the Christian knight Tancredi, she receives baptism at the moment of her death. This later episode charged her interventions earlier in the poem with a sense of providential foreshadowing. For Counter-Reformation audiences, Clorinda’s actions could be read as the stirrings of grace working even within a figure initially fighting for the ‘enemy’ side.

    Preti makes this moral ambiguity central to his painting. He depicts Clorinda not as a caricatured adversary but as a dignified and commanding presence, halting the execution with decisive authority. Her upright bearing and controlled gesture convey authority, while her slightly illuminated figure contrasts with the shadowed forms of Aladine’s retinue. In this way she becomes the true moral axis of the scene, embodying both the poem’s theatricality and its latent theology of redemption.

    Preti’s composition closely echoes the text of Jerusalem Delivered. Sofronia’s steadfast self-sacrifice recalls Tasso’s line: ‘She, steadfast, went, clothed in faith and courage, to meet the cruel death prepared for her‘ (Book II). Olindo’s attempt to take her place finds its source in ‘If guilty blood must quench the fire, then strike at me, for I share her crime and fate‘. Clorinda’s noble intervention is foreshadowed in the passage: ‘She came, strong in spirit and fair in form, and with a voice of command stayed the tyrant’s hand‘. These verses authorised and shaped Preti’s interpretation, allowing him to render Clorinda as the agent of salvation whose later destiny gave the scene heightened theological resonance.

    Mattia Preti (163-1699), Clorinda frees Olindo and Sofronia from the stake, c.1646, Oil on canvas, 248 x 245 cm, Palazzo Rosso, Genoa
    Mattia Preti (163-1699), Clorinda frees Olindo and Sofronia from the stake, c.1646, Oil on canvas, 248 x 245 cm, Palazzo Rosso, Genoa
    Mattia Preti (163-1699), Clorinda frees Olindo and Sofronia from the stake, c.1646, Oil on canvas, 248 x 245 cm, Palazzo Rosso, Genoa
    Mattia Preti (163-1699), Clorinda frees Olindo and Sofronia from the stake, c.1646, Oil on canvas, 248 x 245 cm, Palazzo Rosso, Genoa
  • Antonio Canova (1757 –  1822), ‘The penitent Mary of Magdalene’, c.1793-1796

     Antonio Canova (1757 –  1822), The penitent Mary of Magdalene, c.1793-1796, Carrara marble, 90 cm, Palazzo Bianco, Genoa

    Antonio Canova (1757 –  1822), The penitent Mary of Magdalene, c.1793-1796, Carrara marble, 90 cm, Palazzo Bianco, Genoa

    While the Baroque period was characterised by dramatic movement, emotional intensity, and theatrical compositions, Canova’s work signifies a shift towards the restraint, harmony, and idealisation of form that would define Neoclassicism. The sculpture bridges these two artistic periods, offering a poignant reflection of the transitional period.

    Completed in 1796, this sculpture is an important example of Canova’s departure from Baroque dynamism. Canova retains traces of Baroque emotiveness, seen in Mary Magdalene’s anguished pose and sorrowful expression, but tempers them with a sense of order and grace. Her contrite posture, open arms, and delicate depiction of her body reveal Canova’s mastery of marble and his ability to express both spiritual and physical beauty.

    What makes Penitent Magdalene particularly significant in the context of this transitional period is its embodiment of Neoclassical ideals while retaining a profound sense of human emotion. Unlike the cold academic style that sometimes characterised later Neoclassical works, Canova found a balance between emotional depth and classical restraint. The figure of Mary Magdalene, a repentant sinner, allows for both an idealised physical form and a narrative of redemption and grace, two central themes in Classical and Christian art.

    The sculpture was widely appreciated, not only because of its technical mastery but also because it resonated with the tastes of European patrons, who were increasingly drawn to antiquity’s ideals and the Enlightenment’s emphasis on reason and humanity. Canova’s ability to evoke intellectual and emotional responses made him one of the most sought-after artists of his time.

    The continued production of copies of Canova’s works, even more than a century after his death, reflects the lasting impact of his legacy. Canova was viewed not only as a sculptor who mastered the art of Neoclassicism but also as one who instilled a sense of timeless beauty and humanism in his works.

  • Matthias Stom (c.1600– after 1652), ‘Salome with the Head of St. John the Baptist’, 1630-1652

    Matthias Stom (c.1600– c.1652), Salome with the Head of St. John the Baptist, 1630-1652, Oil on canvas, 95x 85 cm, Palazzo Bianco, Genoa

    Matthias Stom (c.1600– c.1652), Salome with the Head of St. John the Baptist, 1630-1652, Oil on canvas, 95x 85 cm, Palazzo Bianco, Genoa

    Matthias Stom, a largely forgotten figure in art history, was a Flemish or Dutch painter about whom little is known. His entire career unfolded in Italy, where most details of his life and work remain obscure. His work is characterised by a distinctive fusion of Northern European interpretations of Caravaggio’s dramatic use of light and elements from his regional artistic traditions. He was notably influenced by the Utrecht Caravaggisti, particularly the Dutch artist Gerard van Honthorst, whose use of chiaroscuro and expressive realism had a significant impact on Stom’s style. At the same time, his work reflects early 17th-century Flemish traditions, which are evident in his compositions and figure treatment.

    This particular depiction of Salomè, drawn from the biblical account in Mark 6:17-29, shows her holding a silver basin containing the head of John the Baptist. Behind her stands her mother, Herodias, her gaze suggesting that she was the one who instigated the execution. 

    The circumstances of the painting’s commission and creation remain unknown, complicating its precise dating within Stom’s broader body of work. It was only correctly attributed to Stom in 1971. This canvas demonstrates his ability to merge sensuality with religious themes, a combination that resonated with the tastes of his time. 

    The inherent drama of the narrative provided rich opportunities for artistic exploration, allowing painters to investigate themes of power, desire, and the consequences of sin while meeting the period’s demand for religious, sensual, and emotionally charged subjects. The subject was particularly popular in 17th-century art due to its dramatic tension and moral symbolism, encapsulating themes of vengeance, sin, and mortality. Salomè’s role in John’s execution at the behest of her mother presents a stark contrast between beauty and brutality.

  • Chiesa di Santa Maria di Castello, Genoa

    Chiesa di Santa Maria di Castello in Genoa is a landmark of both architecture and devotion, with roots stretching deep into the city’s medieval past. It was built on the foundations of a ninth- or tenth-century church, set beside a fortified bishop’s residence that once dominated the ridge above the harbour. In the first half of the twelfth century it was rebuilt by Antelamic craftsmen, whose work defined its enduring Romanesque character. The layout follows the familiar plan of three naves separated by columns, a timber truss roof, a transept, and three apses, its proportions balanced and its structure plain but imposing.

    A new chapter began in 1442 with the arrival of the Dominican Order. The friars extended the complex, adding chapels, a cloister, and a refectory, and made the church a hub of religious and cultural life. Their patronage brought fresh artistic energy, most notably in the Chapel of Santa Caterina, where Nicolò Corso (1446–c. 1513), also known as Nicolò di Lombarduccio, painted a sequence of frescoes devoted to Saint Catherine of Siena. Corso’s work is marked by clear, luminous colour and a deliberate arrangement of figures, serving both narrative clarity and devotional focus.

    One scene, showing Saint Catherine receiving the Dominican habit, occupies a central place in the cycle. Based on Dominican sources, Raymond of Capua’s Legenda Major, and Catherine’s own writings, it depicts the moment she turned from the world to a life of humility, service, and spiritual dedication. For the Dominicans, this was more than a pious story: it was a visual statement of their ideals, intended to inspire those who worshipped within the chapel to follow her example.

    Chiesa di Santa Maria di Castello, Genoa.
    Chiesa di Santa Maria di Castello, Genoa.
    Chiesa di Santa Maria di Castello, Genoa.
    Chiesa di Santa Maria di Castello, Genoa.
    Chiesa di Santa Maria di Castello, Genoa.
    Chiesa di Santa Maria di Castello, Genoa.
    Chiesa di Santa Maria di Castello, Genoa.
    Chiesa di Santa Maria di Castello, Genoa.

    References

    Whitfield, P. (2020) Historic Churches of Genoa: A Brief Guide. Genoa: Peter Whitfield


  • Bernardo Strozzi in Palazzo Nicolosio Lomellino, Genoa

    By 1623, Bernardo Strozzi had already cemented his reputation as one of Genoa’s most important artists, despite being a Capuchin monk. His patrons included leading aristocratic families, such as the Centurione family, who commissioned him to paint frescoes in their palazzo. These frescoes, notably ‘The Allegory of Faith’ and ‘Astrology and Navigation with Tritons’, were painted at a pivotal moment in Strozzi’s life, just before significant personal and professional changes would force him to leave his native city.

    The frescoes were left unfinished in 1625 due to a dispute with Luigi Centurione. As a result, they were hidden under plaster for centuries until their rediscovery in 2002. ‘The Allegory of Faith depicts Catholicism arriving in the New World, with a woman, likely modelled after his unmarried sister, bringing Christianity to the Indigenous peoples. Strozzi often used his sister as a model in his works, reflecting their close familial bond, which persisted until her later marriage.

    The historical context surrounding Strozzi’s career is fascinating, as local artists had to navigate the political tensions of the time to maintain their positions. Unlike international artists, who often contributed to Genoa’s art, native artists like Strozzi were more vulnerable. Strozzi’s teacher, a prominent Genoese affairs Cesare Corte (1554–1613), had been killed by the Inquisition for possessing Protestant literature. Moreover, Strozzi faced criticism for the sensuality in some of his works, which went against the strict guidelines of the Counter-Reformation.

    The rediscovered frescoes, though damaged, offer a rare insight into Strozzi’s process, revealing preparatory sketches beneath the paint. While the building suffered additional damage during World War II bombings, which affected nearby structures, fragments of these frescoes survived. They showcase Strozzi’s dynamic use of religious and maritime themes, reflecting Genoa’s deep ties to the sea and exploration.

    Bernardo Strozzi in Palazzo Nicolosio Lomellino, Genoa.
    Bernardo Strozzi in Palazzo Nicolosio Lomellino, Genoa.
    Bernardo Strozzi in Palazzo Nicolosio Lomellino, Genoa.
    Bernardo Strozzi in Palazzo Nicolosio Lomellino, Genoa.
    Bernardo Strozzi in Palazzo Nicolosio Lomellino, Genoa.
    Bernardo Strozzi in Palazzo Nicolosio Lomellino, Genoa.
    Bernardo Strozzi in Palazzo Nicolosio Lomellino, Genoa.
    Bernardo Strozzi in Palazzo Nicolosio Lomellino, Genoa.
    Bernardo Strozzi in Palazzo Nicolosio Lomellino, Genoa.
    Bernardo Strozzi in Palazzo Nicolosio Lomellino, Genoa.
  • Palazzo Angelo Giovanni Spinola in Genoa.

    Palazzo Angelo Giovanni Spinola, located at Via Garibaldi 5 in Genoa, is a notable example of Genoese Mannerist architecture from the Renaissance period. Commissioned in 1558 by Angelo Giovanni Spinola, one of the major art collectors of his era, ambassador of the Republic of Genoa to Spain, and banker to Emperor Charles V Habsburg, his son Giulio Spinola completed the palace only in 1576.

    The architectural design was executed by Giovanni Ponzello (1520–1598) and his brother Domenico Ponzello (active 1548–1571), Mannerist architects who contributed to several Genoese palazzi during the same period. The palace’s facade is frescoed with motifs attributed to the workshops of Lazzaro Tavarone (1556–1641) and Pantaleo Calvi (1510–1595). The allegories here celebrate the family’s role as defenders of Catholicism, with scenes from the Stories of Rome.

    The atrium of the palace serves as a visual narrative of the Spinola family. Its pavilion-vaulted ceiling on a square base is adorned with frescoes by the Calvi brothers—Aurelio Calvi and Felice Calvi—created in the early 1590s. At the centre of the atrium’s vault is an octagonal fresco entitled ‘The Battle of Gherardo Spinola against the Florentines’, recounting a significant family victory from around 1330. The Calvi brothers’ work reflects the influence of Perin del Vaga (1501–1547), a disciple of Raphael who had brought such Renaissance ideals to Genoa.

    Surrounding the central fresco are allegorical depictions of virtues, including Christian Faith and Eternal Glory, reinforcing the family’s prominent position within the Catholic Church. On the sides of the atrium, other Spinola family members are represented in Roman attire, bearing the family coat of arms. These include Gherardo Spinola (active 14th century), lord of Lucca and Tortona; Oberto Spinola (active 14th century); and Galeotto Spinola (active 14th century), who held positions of civic authority in Genoa during the 14th century. Latin inscriptions further narrate their deeds, blending visual artistry with narrative—a common practice in the Renaissance for showcasing aristocratic power.

    Palazzo Angelo Giovanni Spinola in Genoa.
    Palazzo Angelo Giovanni Spinola in Genoa.
    Palazzo Angelo Giovanni Spinola in Genoa.
    Palazzo Angelo Giovanni Spinola in Genoa.
    Palazzo Angelo Giovanni Spinola in Genoa.
    Palazzo Angelo Giovanni Spinola in Genoa.
  • Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa

    The history of art cannot be separated from the history of its patrons, whose triumphs and failures often shaped the course of artistic achievement. The Church of San Matteo in Genoa, founded in 1125, embodies this relationship, being intrinsically linked to the powerful Doria family. It was built by Martino Doria as a private chapel and served as a sacred space and a family memorial. Located in Piazza San Matteo, the church is encircled by Doria palazzi, forming a self-contained enclave that underscored their prominence in Genoese society.

    In 1278, the church was transformed into a Ligurian Gothic structure, combining simplicity with grandeur. The facade, adorned with alternating bands of white Carrara marble and dark slate, is a defining feature of Genoese medieval architecture. A large rose window and detailed stone reliefs add to its solemnity. Inside, the single nave and small chapels maintain an understated elegance, while Baroque additions later enriched the space. The presbytery and choir are lined with finely crafted wooden stalls where family members once attended services.

    A unique element of San Matteo is the series of marble inscriptions on the facade, commemorating the Doria family’s military triumphs. These memorials include Lamba Doria’s victory at the Battle of Curzola (1298) and Oberto Doria’s success at the Battle of Meloria (1284), pivotal in Genoa’s conflicts with Venice and Pisa. Inside, plaques honour Andrea Doria, the esteemed admiral whose achievements solidified his family’s power. Andrea commissioned works from Renaissance artists, including frescoes by Luca Cambiaso depicting scenes from Saint Matthew’s life, while the high altar, crafted by Giovanni Giacomo and Giovanni Battista Paracca, features intricate Gothic-inspired sculptures.

    Beneath the main altar, the crypt holds family tombs, with Andrea Doria’s as its centrepiece. Andrea Doria (1466–1560), an essential figure in Genoese history, is memorialised with a marble effigy in classical armour, symbolising his military might. This effigy was created by a Michelangelo pupil, Giovanni Angelo Montorsoli (1507–1563).

    Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa
    Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa
    Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa
    Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa
    Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa
    Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa
    Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa
    Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa
    Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa
    Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa
    Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa
    Chiesa di San Matteo in Genoa

    References

    Whitfield, P. (2020) Historic Churches of Genoa: A Brief Guide. Genoa: Peter Whitfield


  • Palazzo Rosso, Genoa

    Built between 1671 and 1677 under the direction of Pietro Antonio Corradi (1630–1709) and supervised by Matteo Lagomaggiore (1620–1690), the Palazzo Rosso was commissioned by the Brignole Sale family, among the most politically and culturally influential of Genoa’s patriciate. Its construction coincided with the maturity of Genoese Baroque, a period when local patrons and artists had developed a distinctive style that blended Roman grandeur with Ligurian colourism and a preference for complex decorative cycles.

    The palace’s interior decoration brought together a remarkable concentration of talent: Domenico Piola (1627–1703), Gregorio De Ferrari (1647–1726), Paolo Gerolamo Piola (1666–1724), Giovanni Enrico Haffner (1640–1702), Antonio Haffner (1654–1732), Gio. Andrea Carlone (1639–1697), Nicolò Carlone, and Bartolomeo Guidobono (1654–1709). Three artistic dynasties—the Piola, Haffner, and Carlone families—were central to the project. Domenico Piola and his son Paolo Gerolamo oversaw complex narrative fresco cycles, relying on a well-developed stock of preparatory drawings and cartoons to coordinate assistants and ensure compositional coherence. Gregorio De Ferrari introduced a fluid, elongated figural style with daring foreshortenings, while the Haffners were responsible for illusionistic architectural frameworks that visually expanded the rooms. The Carlones contributed both figural painting and sculptural elements, and Guidobono’s refined palette and attention to surface texture brought an additional layer of pictorial richness.

    The execution of such a programme was made possible by the disciplined structure of Genoese workshops. Leading masters directed the major scenes, while assistants adapted established designs for subsidiary areas or for clients of more modest means. Through this system, motifs and stylistic innovations developed for the Palazzo Rosso circulated widely, appearing in other noble residences, parish churches, and private chapels. The palace thus not only expressed the Brignole Sale family’s cultural ambitions but also served as a catalyst in shaping the broader visual language of late seventeenth-century Genoa.

    Palazzo Rosso, Genoa
    Palazzo Rosso, Genoa
  • The Sabine Women as a Baroque Meditation on Rome’s Beginnings

    Luca Giordano ((1634-1705), Rape of the Sabine Women, c.1680, Oil on canvas, 285 × 366 cm. Palazzo Spinola, Genoa

    Luca Giordano (1634-1705), Rape of the Sabine Women, c.1680, Oil on canvas, 285 × 366 cm. Palazzo Spinola, Genoa

    According to the historian Titus Livius (Livy, 59 BC – 17 AD), Romulus orchestrated the abduction of the Sabine women to ensure a population for the city of Rome, which he had only just established. In Giordano’s works, this dramatic moment is rendered with vivid theatricality, capturing the desperation and conflict that marked the founding of Rome.

    This popular theme resonated with artists of Giordano’s time, appealing for its complex interplay of aggression and unification. It offered a pseudo-historical and moral narrative, symbolising the sacrifices linked to the birth of Roman civilisation and the blending of cultures—concepts that deeply resonated with audiences of the Baroque era. The composition’s forceful, dynamic qualities reflect the period’s artistic emphasis on movement and emotional intensity, essential in Baroque iconography.

    In the early 19th century, the painting underwent a significant alteration to reflect the era’s increasing religious conservatism; the female figures were repainted to cover their nudity. This modification was later removed during restoration, restoring Giordano’s original portrayal.

    Luca Giordano (1634-1705), Rape of the Sabine Women, c.1680, Oil on canvas, 285 × 366 cm. Palazzo Spinola, Genoa
    Luca Giordano (1634-1705), Rape of the Sabine Women, c.1680, Oil on canvas, 285 × 366 cm. Palazzo Spinola, Genoa
    Luca Giordano (1634-1705), Rape of the Sabine Women, c.1680, Oil on canvas, 285 × 366 cm. Palazzo Spinola, Genoa
    Luca Giordano (1634-1705), Rape of the Sabine Women, c.1680, Oil on canvas, 285 × 366 cm. Palazzo Spinola, Genoa